United Nations faces backlash after using last month’s gender-inclusive language
UN awaits cancellation over genocidal propaganda
The United Nations is facing serious backlash after firing off a tweet that was clearly intended as a microaggression against emotionally vulnerable populations.
UN Women is the United Nations entity dedicated to the eradication of gender diversity via the promotion of women‘s issues. They are notorious for producing seemingly-innocuous infographics intended to sow confusion while radicalizing politically-moderate individuals into Alt-Right extremists.
This particular image is only one such example of their propaganda, one that utilizes outmoded language to inflict irreparable harm upon already marginalized minorities.
Using last month’s politically-correct language is a common radicalization technique because the average time it takes a new word or symbol to end up on the ADL’s Hate on Display Database (courtesy of Four Chan) is approximately 27.1828 days.
READ: NPC Daily assists Anti-Defamation League in identifying symbols of hate
READ: Redditors push to add hashtag to ADL’s hate symbol database
Whether or not the United Nations understood just what they were tweeting is a moot point because the fact that UN Women even exists is an affront to peoplekind.
There will be a reckoning. Progressives are already calling for the cancellation of the United Nations and favor creating a new, more tolerant world order with help from our Chinese and Venezuelan allies.
To correct the record (and hopefully prevent at least some of our readers from having their lives torn apart due to an innocent slip of the tongue), NPC Daily fact checkers have compiled the following table, and it will be updated accordingly.
| NO ❌ | NO ❌ | YES ✅ |
| peoplekind | ||
| comrade commissar | ||
| persyn of congress | ||
| exploiter | ||
| bastard | ||
| grandma | ||
girlfriend | theyfriend | |
| redistribution representative | ||
| undocumented immigrants | ||
name | pod number | |
| persyn of firefight | ||
| cuck |
If a small amount of our regular readers became subscribers on Subscribestar, we'd have enough funding to no longer be dependent on annoying Google ads cluttering your reading space and we will be protected against deplatforming. Will you subscribe on Subscribestar?
